Interested in a PLAGIARISM-FREE paper based on these particular instructions?...with 100% confidentiality?

Order Now

Analysis of the Argument in a Non-fiction Book

Analysis of the Argument in a Non-fiction Book
Paper details

Analysis of the Argument in a Non-fiction Book
Below are steps to analyzing the argument of the books by Masson, Wise, and Foer.
Choose the one that you prefer. Also, it would be helpful to answer at least some of the
Study Questions on the book that you choose before beginning to analyze its argument.
Analysis of Masson’s Argument in The Pig Who Sang to the Moon
Using the methods and principles in Chapter 2, 3, 7, and 8 of Greene and Lidinsky’s From
Inquiry to Academic Writing, write a paper of about 750-1000 words that analyzes and
evaluates the argument that Jeffrey Moussaieff Masson makes in The Pig Who Sang to the
Moon.
Before trying to write this paper, go through the study questions on Masson’s book,
which can be downloaded from the 1A Study Questions page. You do not have to answer all
these questions in your analysis, but some of them are central to his claim, subclaims, and
evidence, and they should be discussed. This writing assignment will be a test of your ability
to identify and address key aspects of a book-length argument.
Your paper should accomplish the following objectives.
1. Begin with a rhetorical analysis (review Chapter 2 in Greene and Lidinsky).
2. Next, analyze the author’s argument (review Chapter 3 in Greene and Lidinsky,
especially the steps on pages 53 and 58). Clearly indicate how it is organized.
3. Paraphrase and summarize when necessary, following the directions in first part of
Chapter 7 in Greene and Lidinsky. Quotations should be selective and limited. Be
sure to describe the organization of the argument and explain the strategy behind it.
4. Analyze the approaches of the author, making specific reference to ethos, pathos, and
logos (Chapter 8 in Greene and Lidinsky).
5. HINT: As part of your critical thinking, bring in the reasoning of Cartmill, Regan,
Singer, and Cohen. What would each agree with or disagree with in this book?
6. HINT: Look at the claims of fact, value, and policy that Masson lists toward the end of
his book. How convincing is Masson’s argument on the need for these changes?
7. Be sure to follow the rules for avoiding plagiarism, integrating quotations, and citing
and documenting sources in the MLA format (pages 150-161 in Greene and Lidinsky).
8. Include effective uses of the sentence patterns we have studied in Hacker and the PDF
downloads “The Craft of Composing Sentences” and “The Five C’s of Style.”
Analysis of Wise’s Argument in Drawing the Line
Using the methods and principles in Chapter 2, 3, 7, and 8 of Greene and Lidinsky’s From
Inquiry to Academic Writing, write a paper of about 750-1000 words that analyzes and
evaluates the argument that Steven M. Wise makes in Drawing the Line.
Your paper should accomplish the following objectives.
1. Begin with a rhetorical analysis (review Chapter 2 in Greene and Lidinsky).
2. Next, analyze the author’s argument (review Chapter 3 in Greene and Lidinsky,
especially the steps on pages 53 and 58). Clearly indicate how it is organized.
3. Paraphrase and summarize when necessary, following the directions in first part of
Chapter 7 in Greene and Lidinsky. Quotations should be selective and limited. Be
sure to describe the organization of the argument and explain the strategy behind it.
4. Analyze the approaches of the author, making specific reference to ethos, pathos, and
logos (Chapter 8 in Greene and Lidinsky). What unusual methods does Wise use?
5. HINT: As part of your critical thinking, bring in the reasoning of Cartmill, Regan,
Singer, and Cohen. What would each agree with or disagree with in this book?
6. HINT: Look at the claims of fact, value, and policy that Wise makes throughout his
book. How convincing is his argument about the need for these changes?
7. Be sure to follow the rules for avoiding plagiarism, integrating quotations, and citing
and documenting sources in the MLA format (pages 150-161 in Greene and Lidinsky).
8. Include effective uses of the sentence patterns we have studied in Hacker and the PDF
downloads “The Craft of Composing Sentences” and “The Five C’s of Style.”
Analysis of Foer’s Argument in Eating Animals
Using the methods and principles in Chapter 2, 3, 7, and 8 of Greene and Lidinsky’s From
Inquiry to Academic Writing, write a paper of about 750-1000 words that analyzes and
evaluates the argument that Jonathan Saffran Foer makes in Eating Animals
Your paper should accomplish the following objectives.
1. Begin with a rhetorical analysis (review Chapter 2 in Greene and Lidinsky).
2. Next, analyze the author’s argument (review Chapter 3 in Greene and Lidinsky,
especially the steps on pages 53 and 58). Clearly indicate how it is organized.
3. Paraphrase and summarize when necessary, following the directions in first part of
Chapter 7 in Greene and Lidinsky. Quotations should be selective and limited. Be
sure to describe the organization of the argument and explain the strategy behind it.
4. Analyze the approaches of the author, making specific reference to ethos, pathos, and
logos (Chapter 8 in Greene and Lidinsky). What unusual methods does Foer use?
5. HINT: As part of your critical thinking, bring in the reasoning of Cartmill, Regan,
Singer, and Cohen. What would each agree with or disagree with in this book?
6. HINT: Look at the claims of fact, value, and policy that Foer makes throughout his
book. How convincing is his argument about the need for these changes?
7. Be sure to follow the rules for avoiding plagiarism, integrating quotations, and citing
and documenting sources in the MLA format (pages 150-161 in Greene and Lidinsky).
8. Include effective uses of the sentence patterns we have studied in Hacker and the PDF
downloads “The Craft of Composing Sentences” and “The Five C’s of Style

Analysis of the Argument in a Non-fiction Book

Analysis of the Argument in a Non-fiction Book
Paper details

Analysis of the Argument in a Non-fiction Book
Below are steps to analyzing the argument of the books by Masson, Wise, and Foer.
Choose the one that you prefer. Also, it would be helpful to answer at least some of the
Study Questions on the book that you choose before beginning to analyze its argument.
Analysis of Masson’s Argument in The Pig Who Sang to the Moon
Using the methods and principles in Chapter 2, 3, 7, and 8 of Greene and Lidinsky’s From
Inquiry to Academic Writing, write a paper of about 750-1000 words that analyzes and
evaluates the argument that Jeffrey Moussaieff Masson makes in The Pig Who Sang to the
Moon.
Before trying to write this paper, go through the study questions on Masson’s book,
which can be downloaded from the 1A Study Questions page. You do not have to answer all
these questions in your analysis, but some of them are central to his claim, subclaims, and
evidence, and they should be discussed. This writing assignment will be a test of your ability
to identify and address key aspects of a book-length argument.
Your paper should accomplish the following objectives.
1. Begin with a rhetorical analysis (review Chapter 2 in Greene and Lidinsky).
2. Next, analyze the author’s argument (review Chapter 3 in Greene and Lidinsky,
especially the steps on pages 53 and 58). Clearly indicate how it is organized.
3. Paraphrase and summarize when necessary, following the directions in first part of
Chapter 7 in Greene and Lidinsky. Quotations should be selective and limited. Be
sure to describe the organization of the argument and explain the strategy behind it.
4. Analyze the approaches of the author, making specific reference to ethos, pathos, and
logos (Chapter 8 in Greene and Lidinsky).

5. HINT: As part of your critical thinking, bring in the reasoning of Cartmill, Regan,
Singer, and Cohen. What would each agree with or disagree with in this book?
6. HINT: Look at the claims of fact, value, and policy that Masson lists toward the end of
his book. How convincing is Masson’s argument on the need for these changes?
7. Be sure to follow the rules for avoiding plagiarism, integrating quotations, and citing
and documenting sources in the MLA format (pages 150-161 in Greene and Lidinsky).
8. Include effective uses of the sentence patterns we have studied in Hacker and the PDF
downloads “The Craft of Composing Sentences” and “The Five C’s of Style.”
Analysis of Wise’s Argument in Drawing the Line
Using the methods and principles in Chapter 2, 3, 7, and 8 of Greene and Lidinsky’s From
Inquiry to Academic Writing, write a paper of about 750-1000 words that analyzes and
evaluates the argument that Steven M. Wise makes in Drawing the Line.
Your paper should accomplish the following objectives.
1. Begin with a rhetorical analysis (review Chapter 2 in Greene and Lidinsky).
2. Next, analyze the author’s argument (review Chapter 3 in Greene and Lidinsky,
especially the steps on pages 53 and 58). Clearly indicate how it is organized.
3. Paraphrase and summarize when necessary, following the directions in first part of
Chapter 7 in Greene and Lidinsky. Quotations should be selective and limited. Be
sure to describe the organization of the argument and explain the strategy behind it.
4. Analyze the approaches of the author, making specific reference to ethos, pathos, and
logos (Chapter 8 in Greene and Lidinsky). What unusual methods does Wise use?
5. HINT: As part of your critical thinking, bring in the reasoning of Cartmill, Regan,
Singer, and Cohen. What would each agree with or disagree with in this book?
6. HINT: Look at the claims of fact, value, and policy that Wise makes throughout his
book. How convincing is his argument about the need for these changes?
7. Be sure to follow the rules for avoiding plagiarism, integrating quotations, and citing
and documenting sources in the MLA format (pages 150-161 in Greene and Lidinsky).
8. Include effective uses of the sentence patterns we have studied in Hacker and the PDF
downloads “The Craft of Composing Sentences” and “The Five C’s of Style.”
Analysis of Foer’s Argument in Eating Animals
Using the methods and principles in Chapter 2, 3, 7, and 8 of Greene and Lidinsky’s From
Inquiry to Academic Writing, write a paper of about 750-1000 words that analyzes and
evaluates the argument that Jonathan Saffran Foer makes in Eating Animals
Your paper should accomplish the following objectives.
1. Begin with a rhetorical analysis (review Chapter 2 in Greene and Lidinsky).
2. Next, analyze the author’s argument (review Chapter 3 in Greene and Lidinsky,
especially the steps on pages 53 and 58). Clearly indicate how it is organized.
3. Paraphrase and summarize when necessary, following the directions in first part of
Chapter 7 in Greene and Lidinsky. Quotations should be selective and limited. Be
sure to describe the organization of the argument and explain the strategy behind it.
4. Analyze the approaches of the author, making specific reference to ethos, pathos, and
logos (Chapter 8 in Greene and Lidinsky). What unusual methods does Foer use?
5. HINT: As part of your critical thinking, bring in the reasoning of Cartmill, Regan,
Singer, and Cohen. What would each agree with or disagree with in this book?
6. HINT: Look at the claims of fact, value, and policy that Foer makes throughout his
book. How convincing is his argument about the need for these changes?
7. Be sure to follow the rules for avoiding plagiarism, integrating quotations, and citing
and documenting sources in the MLA format (pages 150-161 in Greene and Lidinsky).
8. Include effective uses of the sentence patterns we have studied in Hacker and the PDF
downloads “The Craft of Composing Sentences” and “The Five C’s of Style

Interested in a PLAGIARISM-FREE paper based on these particular instructions?...with 100% confidentiality?

Order Now